Schiff Briefed on Russia-Taliban Bounty Suspicions in February, Withheld Information From Congress

Adam SchiffA few weeks back The New York Times published a story asserting that Russia secretly offered bounties into Taliban forces to kill US troops, citing”officials briefed about the matter.”
President Trump Sunday morning dismissed the New York Times report about the allegations.
“nobody cried told mepersonally, VP Pence, or Chief of Staff Mark Meadows concerning the alleged attacks on our troops in Afghanistan by Russians, as noted through an”anonymous source” by the Fake News New York Times.” Trump said in a set of tweets Sunday morning.
House Intel Chairman and impeachment ringleader Adam Schiff (D-CA) piled on and whined President Trump took no actions against Russia.

TRENDING: BREAKING: Epstein Confidante Ghislaine Maxwell Arrested Say

But, based on Intelligence sources that talked to The Federalist, Adam Schiff’s top aides were briefed about the bounty intel that was Russia-Taliban back to Afghanistan during a CODEL excursion in February.
Schiff was briefed about the rumors back yet he withheld the information from Congress and held no hearings.
When asked by a reporter this week if he had some prior understanding of the Russia faculty rumors, Schiff said,”I can not comment on specifics.”

, on the Taliban bounties being offered by intellect about Russia from Afghanistan, the chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee were briefed in February, but he took no actions in response multiple intelligence sources knowledgeable about the briefing informed The Federalist. The intellect was briefed during CODEL, excursion, or a congressional delegation to Schiff’s team to Afghanistan in February.
Schiff, who has confessed President Donald Trump was never briefed on the so-called intellect, has thus far refused to disclose that his employees was briefed. The revelation raises questions which Schiff is again politicizing, crucial information for civic gain, and even deliberately misrepresenting.
Schiff complaints which Trump took no actions against Russia in response to rumors of bounties are granted that intelligence officers briefed Schiff no action was taken by himself after his team. Schiff, nevertheless, did nothing. He did not short his committee nor did he short 8, that contains top leadership in both chambers’ gang.

It looks like Schiff and his aides may be behind the other round of damaging, selective leaks to the press in order to harass President Trump.
DNI John Ratcliffe said in a statement this week,”The specific leaking of some classified information disrupts vital interagency function to collect, evaluate, and mitigate threats and places our forces at risk. It’s also, in other words, a crime.”
It is considered Schiff’s top aide Sean Misko and’whistleblower’ by leaking his telephone call with President Volodymyr Zelensky, Eric Ciaramella functioned together to impeach President Trump.
Are Schiff’s aides accountable to this bounty escape?

Related Post

This website uses cookies.