EXCLUSIVE: Roger Stone Speaks Out – “Rod Rosenstein Lied to Congress – the Exact Crime Stone Was Falsely Convicted Of”

EXCLUSIVE: Roger Stone releases statement Throughout the Gateway Pundit regarding former DAG Rod Rosenstein’s testimony Before Congress on Wednesday:

Rod Rosenstein Testified under oath before the Senate Judiciary committee that he did NOT  authorize the Mueller investigation into Roger Stone when in reality he signed the next extent memo doing precisely that on October 20, 2017,three months AFTER Mueller knew there wasn’t any Russian collusion. This proves that indictment and Muller’s investigation of Stone has been a political prosecution that they had nothing whatsoever to do with Russian collusion.
Mueller Dirty Cop Aaron Zelinsky, that Representativ Devin Nunes convicted of misconduct in the Papadopoulos case, informed several Federal Judges he’d signs of treason, conspiracy against the USA, violation of the Foreign campaign participation ban, cyber-crimes, such as unauthorized access to a secure computer and the receipt and dissemination of stolen material, wire fraud, and aiding and abetting a felony and being an accessory to a felony after the actuality.  Zelinsky neither hadn’t could get any such signs but leaked the claims to the press.
Mueller’s Dirty Cops essentially fabricated”lying to Congress” charges against Stone though none of the misstatements that Stone produced were neither substance nor did they conceal any underlying offense or criminal activity.
Unlike the Flynn case, Judge Amy Berman Jackson prohibited Stone from raising the Dilemma of misconduct by the Special Counsel, the FBI, the Justice Department or some member of Congress in his defense. Every one the documents of Stones trial as well as the 3 TB'[terabytes] of proof the government dumped in discovery on Stones attorneys stay beneath a protective seal.
In the long run, the best Mueller’s dirty cops could contrive had been a fabricated example of lying to Congress that was written by Andrew Weissmann who abandoned his initials in the’meta-tags’ of this indictment the Special Counsel blast emailed to the press at 7 AM on the day of Stone’s arrest. Even this disclosure was illegal because Stone’s indictment was not unsealed by a federal magistrate until 9:30 AM. Judge Jackson refused to punish the government for their release of a sealed document.
Confirmation of this fact that Rosenstein accepted the scope memo that authorized the investigation of Stone is on page 20 of their Mueller report also has been redacted until lately.
To put it differently, the exact offense Stone was convicted of was lied by Rosenstein.  Is Rosenstein being held to a different standard? When will Rosenstein be prosecuted?

This is the Testimony of Rosenstein from Wednesday when he was asked regarding Stone.
Democrat Senator Chris Coons requested former DAG Rod Rosenstein the following questions about Wednesday (click on link to view video and transcript):

TRENDING: CNN Guest Proposes Abusing White Children in Wake of George Floyd’s Death,”White Kids Don’t Deserve Innocence” (VIDEO)

You authorized filing the indictment in the Roger Stone situation right?
Rod Rosenstein (01:53:28):

And a jury convicted Roger Stone of seven felony counts.
Rod Rosenstein (01:53:32):
When I could just clarify. I feel I don’t think I had been acting attorney general in the time the Stone case has been registered. So I’m certainly aware of it, however I don’t know as a legal matter I don’t know that I authorized it.
Senator Chris Coons (01:53:46):
A jury finally convicted Roger Stone of seven felony counts in the indictment. Do you believe Roger Stone perpetrated those offenses of which he had been convicted?
Rod Rosenstein (01:53:58):
Based upon the jury’s verdict, yes.

And in the Roger Stone case, career prosecutors filed the political direction of this department as well as a movement registered a movement . One went and the career attorneys then withdrew from the situation and resigned from the section. Do you know of some recent case where political appointees registered a recommendation that is so different from what career prosecutors had registered?

I know that your question. The only real issue I would take with it is contains the US attorney’s name. You’re focusing on whose signature appears upon the document, but those files are registered in the US attorney’s name and I considered US attorneys accountable for them.

Do you believe a president should never criticize assault or question Department of Justice investigations?
Rod Rosenstein (01:54:49):
As I believe I’ve made clear I’m not going to comment on the president Senator. I understood the president’s fortune. I don’t think that it’s my job to comment on how he articulates that.

See the interview between Senator Coons and Rod Rosenstein here:

Related Post

This website uses cookies.